Democrats’ 2020 Choice: Do They Want a Fighter or a Healer?

MASON CITY, Iowa — Senator Cory Booker glided into the state first, offering himself as a herald of peace in a northern Iowa church in which advertised “radical hospitality” on its marquee. As a rainbow cracked the frozen sky outside, Mr. Booker spoke of restoring “grace as well as decency” as well as erasing “the lines in which people think divide us — racial lines, religious lines, geographic lines.”

Senator Elizabeth Warren arrived soon after, still thrumming with the energy of a weekend announcement speech in Lawrence, Mass. Having vowed there to “fight my heart out” against government corruption as well as corporate power, Ms. Warren roused the crowd in snow-blanketed Cedar Rapids on Sunday not with bounteous optimism nevertheless a call to arms.

“This particular is usually the time,” she said, “to take on the fight.”

from the space of a weekend, the two Democrats mapped the philosophical as well as temperamental fork their party must navigate as the idea challenges President Trump in 2020. Down one path, Mr. Booker’s, lies a mission of healing as well as trust, having a campaign to bind up social wounds in which have deepened from the Trump era. The additional path, Ms. Warren’s, promises combat as well as more combat — a crusade not just to defeat Mr. Trump nevertheless to demolish the architecture of his government.

As much as any disputation over policy, This particular gulf defines the Democratic presidential field, separating candidates of disparate backgrounds as well as ideologies into two loose groups: fighters as well as healers.

[Check out the Democratic field with our candidate tracker.]

the idea is usually perhaps not an accident in which the most confident Democratic tribunes of Great feeling are all men, while the party’s sternest warriors are mainly women. In a contest for the presidency, a position traditionally viewed in martial terms, the idea may be easier for a man of Mr. Biden’s backslapping swagger or Mr. Booker’s athletic stature to show tenderness or vulnerability without fear of appearing weak.

as well as the idea was with enthusiastic physicality, as well as regular references to having played high school as well as college football, in which Mr. Booker preached love as well as understanding. He clasped his chest as well as his face at moments of emotion, usually stirring murmurs of appreciation as well as sympathy; in one case, he wrapped his arm around a voter for a midspeech selfie. While Mr. Booker said he was ready to spar with Mr. Trump, stating matter-of-factly in which “there is usually nobody in This particular race tougher than me,” his overarching theme was about reconciliation.

At an airy adult learning center in Waterloo, Mr. Booker insisted in which the capacity to conquer all manner of hardships was within human reach — a contrast with Ms. Warren as well as additional populists, who tend to describe ordinary people being stripped of power by big institutions.

“The most common way people give up their power,” Mr. Booker said, “is usually not realizing in which they develop the idea.”

Forces of darkness appeared in Mr. Booker’s political narrative — the country, he said, incorporates a “cancer on our soul” — nevertheless there were few villains. Where malignant people intruded, Mr. Booker leavened their presence with humor: Strom Thurmond, the South Carolina senator who embodied virulent racism, became the subject of a laughter-inducing vocal impression. Describing how a racist white real estate agent directed a dog to attack his father, Mr. Booker added a punch line: Each time his father told the story, he joked, “in which dog got bigger!”

At times, Mr. Booker’s calls for conciliation had an ideological subtext. He repeatedly detailed distinctions with the Democratic left, calling on progressives to “reclaim the fiscally responsible label” as well as denouncing corporate power selectively, focusing chiefly on consolidation from the agricultural sector.

Patti Downs, who went to hear Mr. Booker speak in Waterloo, said she believed he had the leadership abilities to be a Great president. Ms. Downs said she was also eyeing Mr. Biden nevertheless already admired Mr. Booker for his bipartisan instincts as well as his attention to “everyday problems,” like wages as well as health care, rather than more abstract debates.

“We need more of in which, as well as I think he might be the person to do the idea,” said Ms. Downs, a retiree who used to run a health care clinic. “I think maybe he can bring about the alterations of civility, as well as bring politics down through in which lofty place in which most of us have no way to relate to.”

If Mr. Booker’s remarks projected the jaunty optimism of a marching band — his announcement video literally featured one — Ms. Warren’s echoed with cannon fire. In a hall at the Veterans Memorial Building in Cedar Rapids as well as during an afternoon rally at the University of Iowa, she drew roars of applause when pledging to “attack corruption head-on” as well as wrangle power through a set of named foes: drug companies, oil companies, student loan companies, private prison companies, gun companies as well as the National Rifle Association.

All, Ms. Warren declared, should be tamed through legislation as well as regulation.

“Rules matter,” she said, “as well as in which’s why I’m in This particular fight.”

Ms. Warren punctuated her rhetoric having a different set of gestures, pumping a tight fist for emphasis or slicing the air with an open palm; in Cedar Rapids, she closed by raising both hands overhead like a boxer soaking in applause.

Unlike Mr. Booker, Ms. Warren taunted Mr. Trump, urging Democrats not to build their 2020 message around him because he might not be president in which long. “In fact,” she said, “he might not even be a free person.”

“She is usually a fighter, nevertheless I think in which will also unite the country, if we’re fighting for the right purpose,” Ms. Garlock said. “Her purpose is usually to help regular people who are going to work every day, trying to pay their bills, which is usually the majority of This particular country.”

Both approaches have a rich history in Democratic politics, nationally as well as in Iowa — a state in which has helped elevate conciliators like Jimmy Carter as well as Barack Obama to the presidency, while for decades sending prairie populists like Tom Harkin to Congress.

Mr. Booker shares a clear political lineage with Mr. Obama, who captured the Iowa caucuses in 2008 having a message of national unity. nevertheless the party has also shifted left since then, as well as has grown more suspicious of Republicans who harried Mr. Obama as well as elected Mr. Trump. In 2016, Mr. Sanders nearly upset Hillary Clinton in Iowa as a populist insurgent.

Mr. Trump’s slashing style may also weigh on primary voters as well as caucusgoers, Democrats say, guaranteeing in which even a kindhearted nominee could face a blizzard of personal attacks as well as crude trash-talking.

Still, Representative Dave Loebsack, a veteran Democrat whose district covers Iowa’s southeastern quadrant, said he believed in which even partisan Iowans yearned for political reconciliation. Though he is usually neutral from the race, Mr. Loebsack predicted in which Mr. Booker’s uplifting narrative could resonate.

Trudging over an icy driveway outside a house party for Mr. Booker in Iowa City on Friday, Mr. Loebsack warned against doing too much to stoke voters’ indignation.

“I think we have to be careful with anger as well as outrage as well as alienation because in which can also feed into the worst instincts of folks,” Mr. Loebsack said, adding of Mr. Booker: “I love his message of love as well as redemption as well as all the rest.”