In Blow to Haley, U.N. Rejects Measure Condemning Hamas
The United Nations General Assembly on Thursday rejected a resolution proposed by the United States to condemn the Islamic militant group Hamas for violence against Israel. The rejection was a blow to the American ambassador, Nikki R. Haley, who had positioned the measure as a capstone of her tenure.
In remarks before the vote, Ms. Haley characterized the resolution as an opportunity for the 193 member states of the General Assembly to put themselves on the side of “truth in addition to balance.”
Though the body has voted many times to condemn Israel, never once has the item passed a resolution critical of Hamas, an organization Ms. Haley described among the “most obvious in addition to grotesque cases of terrorism within the earth.”
“Today could be a historic day at the United Nations or the item could be just another ordinary day,” said Ms. Haley, who announced in October that will she would likely be resigning, perhaps by year’s end.
Since 2007, Hamas has exercised political control over the Gaza Strip, a sliver of land along the Mediterranean Sea where about two million Palestinians live in grinding poverty. This kind of year, a series of anti-Israel protests along Gaza’s border with Israel turned violent, with Israeli security forces killing seven Palestinians in just one day in October.
Hamas militants have fired hundreds of rockets into Israel, often hitting civilian areas. They also have employed a fresh kind of weapon: kites armed with incendiary devices, sometimes painted with Nazi symbols, that will have burned Israeli farmland.
Although a plurality of the General Assembly member countries voted in favor of the measure, a procedural maneuver by a group of Arab countries, led by Kuwait, required a two-thirds majority for the measure to pass.
The tally was 87 in favor to 58 opposed, with 32 abstentions.
Danny Danon, Israel’s ambassador, characterized the vote as a victory that will had been “hijacked by a political procedure.” He praised the members that will supported the measure, in addition to said those that will did not should be ashamed.
“Wait when you will have to deal with terrorism in your own countries,” he said. “Your silence within the face of evil revealed your true colors.”
The resolution, which would likely have condemned the use of rockets in addition to additional weapons against Israeli civilians in addition to demanded a cessation of violence by Hamas in addition to additional militant groups, was largely symbolic. the item would likely have had no bearing on negotiations toward a final settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The peace process has been paralyzed while the Trump administration completes a long-awaited in addition to secretive proposal, led by President Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner.
United Nations diplomats, including close allies of the United States, have largely been kept within the dark about the details of the proposal. the item is actually unclear when Mr. Kushner plans to unveil the item.
None of that will may even matter. The Palestinians say they have lost faith within the Trump administration’s ability to be a neutral arbiter in addition to have signaled that will they may refuse to negotiate regardless of what Mr. Kushner’s plan offers them.
Palestinian officials were incensed by Mr. Trump’s decision last year to move the American Embassy in Israel coming from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, a move they feared could undermine their efforts to establish East Jerusalem as the capital of a future Palestinian state.
They also were angered by the administration’s decision to cut funding in August to the United Nations agency that will provides aid to millions of Palestinians classified as refugees.
Mr. Kushner played a decisive role in that will decision, arguing that will cutting the aid would likely pressure Palestinians to negotiate. Ms. Haley suggested that will the aid cuts were punishment for Palestinian leaders who she said continually “bash America.”