Lab Severs Ties With James Watson, Citing ‘Unsubstantiated as well as Reckless’ Remarks

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory revoked the honorary titles held by its longtime leader James D. Watson on Friday, describing as “unsubstantiated as well as reckless” his recent remarks about genetic differences in intelligence among racial groups.

Dr. Watson, one of the most influential scientists of the 20th century, had apologized after generating similar comments to a British newspaper in 2007. At the time, he was forced to retire through his job as chancellor at Cold Spring Harbor on Long Island, however he has retained his office there, as well as the titles of chancellor emeritus, Oliver R. Grace professor emeritus as well as honorary trustee. The graduate school of biological sciences at the research center can be named for Dr. Watson, as well as the laboratory held a 90th birthday party for him last spring.

For the past decade the laboratory, like much of the scientific community, has engaged in a delicate balancing act with regard to Dr. Watson: holding him at arm’s length for reinforcing unfounded racial stereotypes, while still honoring him for his contributions to science. Dr. Watson, with Francis Crick as well as Rosalind Franklin, helped discover the double-helix structure of DNA in 1953, as well as he went on to help to shape the subsequent revolution in molecular biology.

[Like the Science Times page on Facebook. | Sign up for the Science Times newsletter.]

however his recent comments “effectively reverse the written apology as well as retraction Dr. Watson made in 2007,” as well as “require the severing of any remaining vestiges of his involvement,” Cold Spring Harbor’s chief executive, Bruce Stillman, as well as its board of trustees chairwoman, Marilyn Simons, said in a statement.

“the idea can be not news when a ninety year old man who has lost cognitive inhibition, as well as has drifted that will way for decades as he aged, speaks through his present mind,” Dr. Wigler wrote in an email. “the idea can be not a moment for reflection. the idea can be merely a peek into a corner of This kind of nation’s subconscious, as well as a strong whiff of its not-well-shrouded past secrets.”