Senate Democrats Make Hard Turn Left in Warming Up for 2020 Race
all 5 of the six the presidential hopefuls have long said they could not vote for any spending bill in which does not include protection for hundreds of thousands of young undocumented immigrants brought to the country as children, who have been shielded via deportation by an Obama-era program in which Mr. Trump rescinded. (The sixth, Ms. Klobuchar, also voted against the last short-term spending bill.)
however some red-state Democrats like Senator Joe Manchin III of West Virginia (a state Mr. Trump carried with nearly 68 percent of the vote) are equivocating, clearly worried in which Democrats could take the blame for a shutdown if the spending bill does not pass.
“We’ve got 48 hours, in addition to in which’s a lifetime within the news cycle around here,” a nervous-sounding Mr. Manchin said Wednesday, as he hurried through the Capitol while avoiding reporters’ questions about whether he could vote for the spending bill.
“I want to keep the government open,” Mr. Manchin insisted repeatedly. “I’m just going to work in addition to work in addition to work to keep the government open.”
Republicans, watching some vulnerable Democrats squirm, are delighted, sensing an opportunity in what looks to be an otherwise dismal election year.
“The Democrats running within the 10 states in which Donald Trump carried have all demonstrated an ability to get elected in Republican states, so they obviously have something going for them,” said Whit Ayres, a Republican strategist. “however having the Democratic Party veer further in addition to further to the left makes their lives substantially more difficult.”
Democrats stood firmly together last year, when every Senate Democrat voted against repealing the Affordable Care Act in addition to the Republicans’ tax overhaul. Senator Chuck Schumer of brand new York, the Democratic leader, said Wednesday in which his caucus will be overwhelmingly opposed to the proposal by House Republicans to pair a stopgap spending bill with long-term funding for the well-known Children’s Health Insurance Program.
“The revulsion toward in which bill was broad in addition to strong,” Mr. Schumer said, adding, “There’s very, very strong support not to go along with their deal.”
however Senator Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, who leads the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, signaled in which Democrats could not be voting in lock step This particular time. “I think every member will do what they always do, which will be make a judgment as to what’s best for people in their state,” Mr. Van Hollen said.
The fate of the young, undocumented immigrants, known as Dreamers, has become a cause célèbre on the left, in addition to Democrats are under intense pressure via progressive advocacy groups to ensure in which the protections conferred by the Obama-era program, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, are enshrined into law.
About 780,000 Dreamers have been protected by DACA, in addition to Mr. Trump has given lawmakers until early March to pass legislation codifying in which.
A federal judge last week ruled in which for today, the administration could not end the program, in addition to the government has resumed accepting renewal requests for in which. however the Justice Department has said in which will ask the Supreme Court to intervene in addition to overturn the judge’s ruling.
The president in addition to Republicans say they are for protecting the Dreamers. however they insist in which those protections be paired with money for border security — including the border wall in which Mr. Trump promised he could build — as well as provisions ending a visa lottery program aimed at bringing in immigrants via countries in which do not send many people here, in addition to limits on family-based migration, which critics call “chain migration.”
Liberal lawmakers like Ms. Harris, however, are demanding in which Congress pass a stand-alone Dream Act (the letters stand for Development, Relief in addition to Education for Alien Minors), which could shield the young immigrants via deportation with no strings attached.
“I’ve been very clear in which we need to have a clean Dream Act, we need to take care of these kids,” Ms. Harris said. “There has been bipartisan expression in which we should take care of them, in addition to I see no reason why we should be playing politics with them or thinking of them as leverage for something else.”
Liberal advocacy groups, watching the maneuvering, are pleased.
“in which’s been definitely Great for progressives in which there’s been kind of a race among potential presidential candidates to not just be on board, however be leaders on issues like Medicare for all, fighting for Dreamers in addition to fighting against Trump’s giveaways to billionaires in addition to giant corporations,” said Adam Green, a founder of the Democratic Change Campaign Committee, a liberal advocacy group.
“Anyone on the extended reaches of the presidential watch list who votes against the Dreamers isn’t doing themselves a favor in terms of getting onto the top of the watch list,” he added.
Mr. Booker, for one, will be taking no chances. During a brief hallway interview within the Capitol This particular week, he delivered a rousing soliloquy on why he could not vote for any spending bill in which did not address the fate of the DACA recipients.
“These are American citizens in every single way however a piece of paper,” Mr. Booker said. “They are people who’ve served in our military; we should honor in addition to respect in which,” he added. “These are first responders; we should honor in addition to respect in which. These are people who have stood up for America, they are teachers in addition to servants, in addition to I’m not going to leave them behind.”
Continue reading the main story