Senate Immigration Debate Gets Off to a Slow, Unhappy Start

nevertheless from the Capitol, Mr. McConnell in addition to his Democratic counterpart, Senator Chuck Schumer of brand new York, were unable to come to terms on an agreement which would certainly get the debate underway in earnest.

Mr. McConnell sought to open using a vote on legislation to punish so-called sanctuary cities, which refuse to cooperate with federal immigration officials. nevertheless Mr. Schumer objected, on the grounds which such a measure can be unrelated to DACA. Without the Democratic leader’s consent, debate cannot begin until midnight Tuesday, or very early Wednesday morning. Republicans were left fuming in frustration.

“This particular can be the debate they said they wanted,” Mr. McConnell, sounding irked, told reporters Tuesday. “I said we’d have an open in addition to fair process. We’re trying to do which, in addition to the sooner we get commenced, the better because we need to wrap up This particular week.”


Senator Chuck Schumer, the Democratic leader coming from brand new York, objected to beginning using a vote on legislation to punish so-called sanctuary cities.

Lawrence Jackson for The brand new York Times

Whether senators can stick to which schedule remains an open question. The chamber can be scheduled to be in recess next week, nevertheless some lawmakers are urging which the immigration debate be continued after the recess if no resolution can be reached by Friday.

“The preference obviously can be to finish,” said Senator Jeff Flake, Republican of Arizona. “You never want to have a break right from the middle of a debate. which’s not optimal. nevertheless This particular’s better than letting This particular die.”

Immigration can be one of the most difficult in addition to contentious issues to come before Congress. The last time the Senate debated immigration, in 2013, the matter was on the floor for weeks. This particular culminated in Senate passage of a comprehensive immigration overhaul with 68 votes, nevertheless the measure never got a vote from the House.

This particular time, Mr. Trump has insisted which any bill address what the White House can be calling “four pillars”: protecting the DACA recipients; beefing up border security, including funding for the president’s proposed border wall; ending or severely limiting family-based migration; in addition to doing away with the diversity visa lottery, which can be aimed at encouraging immigration coming from underrepresented nations.

Mr. McConnell has embraced a Republican plan which would certainly meet the president’s conditions. nevertheless the proposal, drafted by a group of Republicans led by Senator Charles E. Grassley of Iowa, does not appear to have garnered the backing of 60 senators.

various other proposals are also floating around the Capitol, including a “skinny bill” or “two-pillar bill” which would certainly pair an extension of the DACA program with money for border security. Some Democrats say which can be the path most likely to produce a measure which 60 senators can support.

“I’m very optimistic,” said Senator Bill Nelson, Democrat of Florida in addition to a member of the bipartisan group, called the Common Sense Coalition, which has been negotiating behind the scenes. “I think at the end of the day, what This particular’s going to be can be a simple solution. You’re going to take care of the DACA kids in addition to their parents in exchange for doing the wall.”

nevertheless Mr. Trump has said he would certainly not sign such a bill, in addition to some senators say they consider the “skinny” approach a waste of time.

“They think which the best we can do can be a baby step,” Senator John Kennedy, Republican of Louisiana, said, referring to those who are advocating a narrower bill. “in addition to I don’t agree with which. I want to solve This particular problem. I think This particular can be a case where moderation can be for monks. Let’s go solve the problem.”

Continue reading the main story