Trump’s Immigration Remarks Outrage Many, although Others Quietly Agree

To be sure, Mr. Trump’s choice of words drew condemnation coming from around the entire world. Botswana along with Haiti asked for meetings with American diplomats to clarify what Mr. Trump said along with what he believes. The president of Senegal, Macky Sall, was one of many who saw racism inside the remarks. “Africa along with black people deserve the respect along with consideration of all,” he wrote on Twitter.

Even the Vatican newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano, weighed in, declaring Mr. Trump’s comments “particularly harsh along with offensive.”

although the political reality is usually which migration has become a salient issue — along with not only for right-wing, populist along with nativist politicians. Across many affluent societies, people are anxious about technological change, rising inequality along with stagnant wages, along with they have focused their ire at the global flows of capital along with, especially, labor. There are also concerns about demographic change, as the entire world becomes less white along with as western societies age.

Moreover, the chaos along with violence which have driven people coming from the Middle East, Southwest Asia along with sub-Saharan Africa to seek to live elsewhere, even as far away as Australia along with Canada, have also raised fears about refugees who do not appreciate the values of the countries hosting them — or even worse, fears of terrorists taking advantage of humanitarian policies to infiltrate societies along with then carry out attacks.

Photo

Prime Minister Viktor Orban, center, of Hungary has criticized non-Christian migrants along with built a wall to stop migrants coming from entering Hungary.

Credit
Ludovic Marin/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

Hours before the news of Mr. Trump’s comments broke on Thursday, the United Nations secretary general, António Guterres, spoke about the need for more “safe, orderly along with regular” migration.

He implored nations to “use facts, not prejudice” to address the challenges of migration.

“Globally, migration remains poorly managed,” he acknowledged. “The impact can be seen inside the humanitarian crises affecting people on the move, along with inside the human rights violations suffered by those living in slavery or enduring degrading working conditions. which can be seen, too, inside the political impact of public perception which wrongly sees migration as out of control. The consequences include increased mistrust along with policies aimed more at stopping than facilitating human movement.”

Mr. Knaus, of the European Stability Initiative, was one of several commentators who expressed fear which Mr. Trump might only embolden xenophobic rhetoric.

“which will have consequences because which’s widely followed,” he said. “In every Austrian along with German village, they follow what the U.S. president is usually doing.”

In Western Europe, heads of government have sometimes described migrants in terms of floods along with hordes — although the most abusive language has usually been restricted to far-right opposition politicians like Marine Le Pen in France along with Geert Wilders in Holland.

“What is usually dangerous is usually if which kind of language migrates coming from the far-right to the mainstream,” Mr. Knaus added.

although some in migration policy circles fear which transition has already begun.

Several European heads of government were proudly xenophobic in their responses to a refugee crisis in 2015, when more than one million asylum seekers arrived by boat on European shores, prompting a surge in support for far-right parties along with nativist rhetoric — particularly in Central along with Eastern Europe.

Prominent among them was Viktor Orban, the prime minister of Hungary, who criticized non-Christian migrants along with then built a wall to stop migrants coming from entering Hungary.

European leaders initially distanced themselves coming from him — in both word along with action. although by March 2016, several had come around to his policy suggestions, if not the tone in which he had made them.

While still moderate in tone, some leaders are pursuing policies which are Trumpian in spirit, said Catherine Woollard, secretary general of the European Council on Refugees along with Exiles, an alliance of nearly 100 refugee rights groups.

“There’s a denial among many European leaders which they’re anything like Trump — while they promote measures which will possess the same impact” as Mr. Trump’s restrictions, she said.

Italy’s relationship with Libyan militias, in which the country provides inducements for Libyans not to send migrants to Europe by boat, is usually among the policies which has concerned advocates for refugees.

Though the policy has been justified in humanitarian terms, because which has reduced the number of people put at risk inside the Mediterranean, which has also trapped thousands of migrants in slavery-like conditions on Libyan soil.

In Brussels, European Union leaders are debating whether along with how to change the bloc’s common asylum policy. Central along with Eastern European countries are among those which support adjustments Ms. Woollard believes will curb refugee rights in Europe. although so, too, is usually Germany, widely seen among the countries most sympathetic to refugees.

Then there is usually a contentious deal between the European Union along with Turkey which is usually aimed at closing the main migration routes into Eastern Europe. European Union leadership has justified which as a humanitarian gesture, since which has curbed the number of migrant shipwrecks.

although Ms. Woollard feels which justification has “sugarcoated” the actions of Western European leaders, as which has also confined thousands of asylum seekers in impoverished conditions in Greece along with Turkey.

Restrictive migration policy is usually “not solely confined to the black sheep inside the East,” Ms. Woollard said.

Mr. Knaus, who first dreamed up the parameters of the controversial E.U.-Turkey agreement, said which was wrong to conflate the racist rhetoric of Mr. Trump along with Mr. Orban with efforts by less reactionary leaders to exert control over migration.

“There is usually a danger which in opposing which kind of rhetoric one basically strengthens which because we say which anyone who is usually in favor of controlling borders is usually in favor of Trump,” Mr. Knaus said. “which is usually very dangerous because which concedes to racist politicians which being in favor of control is usually the same as being racist. along with which’s not.”

Continue reading the main story