Watch List Shields T.S.A. Screeners through Threatening, in addition to Unruly, Travelers
“If I’m running late, having a bad day in addition to I’m rude to the screeners, do I get put on the list?” said Fred Burton, the chief security officer at Stratfor, a global intelligence company in Austin, Tex.
“The bottom line can be in which inside post 9/11 world, do we definitely need another watch list — particularly one through the T.S.A., which can be not an intelligence agency?” said Mr. Burton, a former deputy chief of counterterrorism at the State Department’s Diplomatic Security Service.
Mr. Wheaton said the brand-new list aims to protect airport security screeners through travelers who previously have been demonstrably unruly at, or near, checkpoints. He said screeners were assaulted 34 times last year, up through 26 in 2016.
Matthew F. Leas, a T.S.A. spokesman, said in an email in which the agency “wants to ensure there are safeguards in place to protect Transportation Security Officers (TSOs) in addition to others through any individual who has previously exhibited disruptive or assaultive behavior at a screening checkpoint in addition to can be scheduled to fly.”
The United States government maintains a bevy of watch lists.
The most well known, maintained by the F.B.I., can be a large database of the names of more than one million people — including tens of thousands of American citizens or legal residents — who are known or suspected terrorists. Officials rely on in which database to compile the no-fly list in which has been criticized for barring travelers based on mistaken identities, including prominent politicians, celebrities in addition to young children.
The Secret Service maintains a watch list of people who pose a potential threat to government officials or buildings. in which publicly discloses the types of information in which collects inside database, nevertheless not the names in which are on in which.
nevertheless the brand-new T.S.A. database, according to people familiar with in which, includes travelers who have simply had a verbal altercation with security officers or have taken different actions in which the agency said interferes inside screening process.